Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with diabetes: Data from the diabetes prospective follow‐up ( DPV ) registry
Rattachement africain : de, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: To analyse predictors for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in people with diabetes aged ≥60 years using insulin therapy and to assess the rates of CGM use during recent years (2019-2021). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective study including 6849 individuals with diabetes and insulin therapy (type 2 diabetes: n = 5320; type 1 diabetes: n = 1529) aged ≥60 years. Data from 129 treatment centres were retrieved from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV) in March 2023. RESULTS: Sensor use in individuals aged ≥60 years has increased in type 1 (2019: 28%, 2020: 39%, 2021: 45%) and type 2 diabetes (2019: 10%, 2020: 16%, 2021: 18%). Predictors for sensor use in older individuals with type 1 diabetes are younger age and CSII use (p < 0.001). Predictors in older individuals with type 2 diabetes are younger age, longer diabetes duration, higher BMI and CSII use (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CGM has become more common in older adults with diabetes and will presumably increase further. Age is a predictor for sensor use in older adults with diabetes. Age-related physical barriers and insufficient usability of devices, lack of interest in technologies, but possibly also effects of prejudice on the grounds of age may contribute to this finding.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with diabetes: Data from the diabetes prospective follow‐up ( <scp>DPV</scp> ) registry
- Date Crossref
- 27/11/2023
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.