Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

2889. One vs Three Weekly Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G for Treatment of Early Syphilis in Persons with and without HIV: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
14Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Syphilis rates in the United Stated (U.S.) have increased steadily for over a decade. Despite over 75 years as the drug of choice for syphilis treatment, controversy persists on optimal duration of therapy with benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for persons with early(primary, secondary, and early latent) syphilis, particularly for persons co-infected with HIV. Given the ongoing national shortages of BPG, optimizing duration of therapy is an urgent concern. Methods We conducted a multicenter RCT comparing a single intramuscular (IM) injection of BPG, 2.4 million units to BPG administered for three successive weeks for treatment of early syphilis in persons with and without HIV. The primary outcome of the study was a > 4-fold decline in RPR titer measured at 6 months. Intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol analyses were performed and were similar. ITT analyses are presented here. Results A total of 249 persons with early syphilis were enrolled at 10 participating sites. Most (97%) participants were were categorized as male sex, black race (62%), and 153 (64%) were living with HIV. The syphilis stage distribution was 19% primary, 47% secondary, and 33% early latent and did not differ significantly by HIV status. Serologic response (> 4-fold decline in RPR titer) at 6 months was 76% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.68-0.82) in the single dose group and did not differ significantly from the three-dose group (70%, 95% CI 0.61-0.77). There were no treatment failures (> 4-fold increase in RPR titer). Among persons with and without HIV there was no significant difference in RPR response at 6 months: 76% in the single-dose group vs. 71% in the 3-dose group (95% CI 0.05-0.17). Most participants experienced mild to moderate local injection site pain and tenderness. Conclusion Treatment of persons with early syphilis with more than a single dose of 2.4 million units of BPG offers no therapeutic benefit irrespective of HIV infection status and was associated with increased rates of injection site discomfort. Disclosures Edward W. Hook, III, FIDSA, GARPD (Global Antibiotic Resistance Program: Advisor/Consultant|Talis Biomedical: Advisor/Consultant|VISBY Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant Candice J. McNeil, MD, MPH, BARDA/GSK: Grant/Research Support|Becton Dickinson: Grant/Research Support|Cepheid: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Hologic: Grant/Research Support|Lupin: study product Julia C. Dombrowski, MD, MPH, Hologic: Grant/Research Support|Mayne Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
2889. One vs Three Weekly Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G for Treatment of Early Syphilis in Persons with and without HIV: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Date Crossref
27/11/2023
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentReproductive tract infections researchBlood groups and transfusion

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.