Healthy Store Programs and WIC, but not SNAP, are Associated with Corner Store Healthfulness
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction In response to residents’ lack of access to healthy foods, many low‐income communities are instituting local healthy corner store programs. Some stores also participate in the United States Department of Agriculture's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This study compared the healthfulness of offerings at stores participating in a local healthy store program, WIC, and/or SNAP to those of similar non‐participating stores, using two different assessment tools. Methods Based on store audits conducted in 315 New Jersey corner stores, healthy food availability scores were calculated using an adapted version of the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey for Corner Stores (NEMS‐CS) and a short‐form corner store audit tool (SCAT). Multivariate linear regression was used to examine associations between program participation and scores on both instruments. Results Adjusting for store and block group characteristics, stores participating in the local healthy store program had significantly higher SCAT scores than did non‐participating stores (upgraded: M = 3.18, 95% CI 2.65–3.71; non‐upgraded: M = 2.52, 95% CI 2.32–2.73); scores on the adapted NEMS‐CS did not differ (upgraded: M = 12.8, 95% CI 11.6–14.1; non‐upgraded: M = 12.5, 95% CI 12.0–13.0). WIC‐participating stores had significantly higher scores compared to non‐participating stores on both tools. Stores participating in SNAP only (and not in WIC) scored significantly lower on both instruments compared to non‐SNAP stores. Conclusions WIC‐participating and non‐SNAP corner stores had higher healthfulness scores on both assessment tools. Only the SCAT was useful in discriminating between upgraded and non‐upgraded stores. Support or Funding Information This research was funded by a National Institute of Food and Agriculture predoctoral dissertation fellowship (20146701122279) and by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R01HD071583‐01A1).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Healthy Store Programs and WIC, but not SNAP, are Associated with Corner Store Healthfulness
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2016
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Arizona State University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Delaware Center for Research in Education and Social Policy pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The State University of New Jersey Rutgers pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Nutrition and Health Promotion pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Nursing and Health Innovation pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Center for State Health Policy Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ Center for State Health Policy pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Arizona State University, Center for Research in Education and Social Policy — University of Delaware et Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.