Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Evaluation

Résumé fourni par la source

Background and Objectives: The primary method for assessing pelvic floor defects is through physical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a radiological technique that is useful for identifying the underlying defects of pelvic floor structures that require surgery. The primary aim of this study was to find correspondence between the clinical and radiological staging of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) before and after vaginal surgery. A secondary endpoint was to investigate, through clinical and MRI findings, whether surgery influences continence mechanisms. Finally, we reported changes in the quality of life of women who underwent surgery for prolapse. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five women with prolapse stage ≥ 2 POP-Q were recruited in this prospective study. They underwent preoperative clinical examination, MRI at rest and under the Valsalva maneuver, and quality of life questionnaires. Three months after vaginal surgery, they repeated clinical and radiological evaluation. Results: Twenty women completed the study. Both clinical and MRI evaluations showed an improvement in prolapse and symptoms after surgery. There were some discrepancies between clinical and radiological staging. MRI parameters did not show differences between pre- and postoperative values at rest; under the Valsalva maneuver, instead, the measurements changed after surgery. Continence was not worsened by the widening of the vesicourethral angle. Patients reported an improvement in quality of life. Conclusions: MRI is an accurate and objective method for defining the stage of prolapse, but clinical evaluation alone is sufficient for staging prolapse before surgery and evaluating the result at follow-up. It is an accurate method for visualizing some pelvic structures that can be compromised because of pelvic organ prolapse. MRI showed that vaginal surgery does not affect continence mechanisms.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.