Meta-analysis on the Prevalence and Impact of False, Nonactionable, and Nuisance Alarms in Critical Care Environments: Informing Evidence-Based Practices for Improving Patient Safety in Alarm Monitoring Systems
Rattachement africain : th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This meta-analysis aims to provide insights into the prevalence of nuisance alarms in physiologic bedside monitoring within intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Through a systematic synthesis of prevalence studies, a meta-analysis was conducted using inverse variance weighting. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The selection criteria were defined, and the quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) tool. The estimated prevalence of nuisance alarms was calculated based on the pooled data from the selected studies. The heterogeneity among the included studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I^2 statistic. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 to determine the presence of significant heterogeneity. The meta-analysis revealed an estimated prevalence of approximately 70% [0.708 (95% CI: 0.547-0.830, p < 0.01)] for false alarms in ICU monitoring. These findings underscore the urgent need to address this prevalent issue in healthcare settings. The identified themes highlighted the significance of reducing false alarms to improve healthcare provider efficiency, enhance patient safety, and optimize alarm management practices. The high prevalence of false alarms emphasizes the need for concerted efforts to mitigate this issue. By addressing the identified themes and implementing evidence-based strategies, healthcare providers can enhance alarm management practices and optimize patient safety in ICU settings. Further research and advancements in medical engineering are warranted to refine alarm systems and improve their reliability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Meta-analysis on the Prevalence and Impact of False, Nonactionable, and Nuisance Alarms in Critical Care Environments: Informing Evidence-Based Practices for Improving Patient Safety in Alarm Monitoring Systems
- Date Crossref
- 28/10/2023
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Loei Rajabhat University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Western University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Prince of Songkla University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Sector of Human Resource Management Loei Provincial Public Health Office pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Faculty of Nursing Thai Association for Medical Instrumentation pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Loei General Hospital Department of Nephrology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Loei Rajabhat University, Western University et Prince of Songkla University, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.