EGS P34 CEPOD Booking Audit in General Surgery

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Repeated internal audits suggested 20% of patients booked into the emergency general surgery theatre list failed to achieve their allotted time to theatre. We wished to investigate this further, identify potential reasons and whether any delay resulted in patient harm. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 760 consecutive adult patients over a 12 month period booked for appendicectomy, hernia repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomy or abscess I+D. We excluded laparotomies and patients under 18yoa. We recorded pre-operative CEPOD classification, adherence to the timeframe and reasons for delays. Outcome measures included total length of stay(TOLOS), post-op length of stay (POLOS) and unexpected intraoperative findings. Results Of 760 emergency procedures, 638 (84%) achieved the desired time frame and 122 (16%) were delayed. Of the 122 delayed cases, 99 (81%) were appropriately booked (clinical review). Most delays were caused by a higher priority emergency but in one third of delays no reason was recorded. There was no difference in median POLOS or unexpected findings between the two groups of those achieving expected time to theatre and those delayed. Conclusions Despite our initial concerns regarding delays to theatre this only occurred in 16% of the study group with no discernible difference in outcomes as measured. The repeated clinical review of potentially delayed emergency patients accessing the operating theatre appears to be safe.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.