Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 erratum

Corrigendum to ‘A mixed-methods study to define Textbook Outcome for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease with hospital variation analyses in Dutch trial data’ [Volume 25, Issue 9, September 2023, Pages 1000–1010]

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

The authors regret that during ongoing research into optimizing care for patients with gallstones, an error was detected in the result section of a recent publication in HPB. We reported an incorrect percentage of Textbook Outcome. In the article: “A mixed-methods study to define Textbook Outcome for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease with hospital variation analyses in Dutch trial data”,1Thunnissen F.M. Comes D.J. Latenstein C.S.S. Stommel M.W.J. van Laarhoven C.J.H.M. Drenth J.P.H. et al.Invited International CollaboratorsA mixed-methods study to define Textbook Outcome for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease with hospital variation analyses in Dutch trial data.HPB (Oxford). 2023 Sep; 25 (Epub 2023 May 15. PMID: 37301634): 1000-1010https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.005Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar we reported on the percentage of patients with Textbook Outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and after conservative management for gallstone disease. The reported percentages of Textbook Outcome rates were 76.1 % for patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 64.1 % for patients who underwent conservative therapy (P < .001). We notified that the reported percentages are incorrect. The correct percentages are 67.9 % (763/1124) for patients who underwent surgery and 54.7 % (239/437) for patients who underwent conservative therapy (P < .001). Although the accurate percentages are lower for both groups, the correct numbers do not affect the conclusion of the study. Reporting this flaw represents the correct results of this study and makes it possible to report on further research into the predictive factors for Textbook Outcome in this large group of patients with gallstone disease. This erratum to the published data aligns with our commitment to upholding scientific accuracy and transparency in our research. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. A mixed-methods study to define Textbook Outcome for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease with hospital variation analyses in Dutch trial dataHPBVol. 25Issue 9PreviewInternational consensus on the ideal outcome for treatment of uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease is absent. This mixed-method study defined a Textbook Outcome (TO) for this large group of patients. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Corrigendum to ‘A mixed-methods study to define Textbook Outcome for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease with hospital variation analyses in Dutch trial data’ [Volume 25, Issue 9, September 2023, Pages 1000–1010]
Date Crossref
01/02/2024
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Gallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersDiverticular Disease and ComplicationsAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.