PATH-24. A CASE SERIES OF LONGER THAN EXPECTED SURVIVAL IN IDH-WILDTYPE, MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Despite interventions with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a difficult cancer to treat. Only 6.9% of patients survive five years post-diagnosis1 and the median overall survival is reported to be in the range of 14-15 months.2Glioblastoma patients who harbor an IDH-mutation have a known improved survival rate over their IDH-wildtype counterparts and under the recent WHO 2021 Classification of CNS tumors, IDH-mutational status is now an established criteria for the classification of high-grade gliomas. MGMT methylation status is also a well-described prognostic factor in GBM. MGMT methylated patients have a more favorable prognosis and better response to conventional treatment with temozolomide.3 It is rare but there are some IDH-wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated GBM patients who survive longer than 4 years. Therefore, it is important to identify other potential favorable factors for longer survival in the unfavorable cohort of patients with IDH-wildtype and MGMT-unmethylated GBM. Case Series: Eighty-five GBM patients who had next generation sequencing completed at the University of California, Irvine were reviewed. Of 85 patients, 4 patients (4.7%) were IDH-wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated and lived longer than 4 years. We evaluated the pathology, clinical characteristics, treatment course, and molecular findings of these 4 long term GBM survivors with IDH-wildtype and MGMT-unmethylated status. Discussion: This case series of 4 cases of patients with IDH-wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated GBM with longer than expected survival did not reveal a ubiquitously prevalent molecular marker for long term survival based on review of next-generation sequencing results. 2 out of the 4 patients harbored an uncommon MTAP copy number loss mutation, which may warrant further investigation into the significance of this mutation on prognosis. 3 out of 4 patients received a vaccine-based intervention through clinical trial which may support ongoing investigation into the additional benefit this specific population of GBM patients may have from vaccine-based therapy.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.