Association of Access to the Radial Artery with Reduced Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury
Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The research looks at access to the radial artery in contemporary medicine to lower the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI). In an effort to increase patient-centered procedural safety, it evaluates evidence contrasting radial versus femoral access. Objective: To determine if access to the radial artery and the prevalence of AKI during interventional procedures, with an emphasis on evaluating the possible advantages of radial access in lowering the risk of AKI. Methods: An examination of 132 instances classified by access location (radial artery as opposed to other sites) was done retrospectively. Beginning in September 2022 and ending in March 2023, the study's length was six months. AKI incidence, procedure specifics, and demographic data were compared. The independent influence of radial access on the risk of AKI was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Results: The radial artery group (13.6%) exhibited a significantly lower AKI incidence than the comparator group (27.3%). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent association. Conclusions: The possible relevance of access to the radial artery in reducing post-procedural AKI highlights the possibility of a safer alternative. Evidence-based access site selection is becoming more crucial in the age of patient-centered healthcare to improve procedural outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association of Access to the Radial Artery with Reduced Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2023
- Éditeur
- CrossLinks International Publishers
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.