H3 K27-altered diffuse midline glioma in adults arising from atypical regions: Two case reports and literature review
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3 K27-altered, is a newly defined "pediatric-type," diffuse, high-grade glioma under current WHO classifications (updated in 2021). An essential diagnostic criteria of DMG is its occurrence in the midline structures; most intracranial DMG occurs in the brainstem or thalamus but can also occur in other midline structures. We experienced 2 adult cases of intracranial DMGs in areas other than the brainstem and thalamus that were initially difficult to diagnose. Case 1 was a 49-year-old man with extensive T2 high-signal lesions in the bilateral frontal lobes and corpus callosum on brain MRI. A Gd-based contrast medium partially enhanced the lesion and showed marked diffusion restriction, mimicking malignant lymphoma. Case 2 was a 24-year-old man who presented with paroxysmal olfactory abnormalities. The tumor extended mainly to the right temporal lobe, the right basal forebrain, and the bilateral hypothalamus, showing a T2/FLAIR mismatch sign suggestive of IDH-mutant astrocytoma without 1p/19q co-deletion. After a biopsy, both cases were properly diagnosed as DMG, H3 K27-altered (K27M-mutant). Diagnosing adult cases involving atypical midline structures is sometimes challenging before surgery; we discuss this phenomenon with both case details and a literature review.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- H3 K27-altered diffuse midline glioma in adults arising from atypical regions: Two case reports and literature review
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.