Clinical Characteristics of Non-Malignant Effusions: Results from the ERS International Collaborative Effusion (ICE) Database
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Non-malignant pleural effusions (PE) are underrepresented in the literature despite their high prevalence. We report data collected on organ-failure related effusions (heart, renal and hepatic) by the ICE project. Aims: To report PE characteristics, prognostic features, refractory PE features, interventions and related complications in this cohort. Methods: 15 sites in 10 countries reported anonymised, retrospective data from 2004-2021. 755 cases were analysed: 560 cardiac, 131 hepatic and 64 renal. Results: Mean age was 74.3 (62% male). Commonest symptoms were dypsnoea (89%) and cough (32%). 302/755 (40%) PE were bilateral, 304 (40%) right- and 151 (20%) left-sided. Predominant cytological type was mesothelial 227/755 (30%) or lymphocytic 189 (25%). Overall 1 year survival was 73%. Renal and neutrophil-predominant PE conferred poorer prognosis. Atrial fibrillation was associated with survival benefit in cardiac PE. 383/755 (50.1%) of effusions recurred. Most PE were managed medically - 25% underwent repeated thoracentesis, 9% chest drainage and 5% indwelling pleural catheter insertion. The commonest management complication was electrolyte disturbance in 70/755 (8%). Conclusions: This large multinational study shows organ failure related PE, particularly renal PE, confer poor prognosis. Recurrence is common, requiring repeated interventions, but complication rates are low.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical Characteristics of Non-Malignant Effusions: Results from the ERS International Collaborative Effusion (ICE) Database
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2023
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.