Low baseline FVC predicts enhanced risk of CLAD and death in lung transplant recipients
Rattachement africain : no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is defined as reduced pulmonary function from the best (baseline) values achieved after lung transplant (LTx), in the absence of other causes. Objective: To determine the association between low baseline values (lowBL), CLAD, and survival. Methods: Data from bilateral LTx recipients from 2014-2020 were collected. CLAD was defined by ISHLT criteria, and lowBL as failure to achieve ≥80% predicted for FEV1, FVC, and TLC and ≥75% of predicted for DLCO. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between lowBL, CLAD and death. Results: In total, 205 LTx patients (52% male) were included in the study (mean (SD) age 53±12 years). Sixty patients (62% male) were diagnosed with CLAD. In the overall cohort, median CLAD-free survival was 6.9 years. In univariate analyses, lowBL for FEV1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79 [95%CI 1.18-2.73], p=0.007), FVC (HR 2.42 [95%CI 1.58-3.70], p<0.001), and DLCO (HR 1.70 [95%CI 1.11-2.61], p=0.016) were all associated with reduced time to CLAD or death, while lowBL for TLC was not. In a multivariable cox model, only lowBL FVC (HR 2.24 [95%CI 1.20-4.18], p=0.011) was associated with higher risk of death or developing CLAD. Time from LTx to CLAD or death was also reduced in those with lowBL for FVC (figure 1). Conclusion: LowBL FVC predicts increased risk of developing CLAD and impaired survival in bilateral LTX patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Low baseline FVC predicts enhanced risk of CLAD and death in lung transplant recipients
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2023
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.