Impaired xenon gas transfer observed two years after COVID-19 hospitalisation in patients with signs of interstitial lung disease
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Interstitial lung changes persist in some patients after COVID-19 hospitalisation. Aim: To characterise longitudinal pulmonary changes due to COVID-19 using 129Xe and 1H MRI. Methods: Patients with abnormal CT or 1H MRI underwent MRI and PFTs up to 106 weeks after hospitalisation. MRI protocol: 129Xe gas transfer (key metric: red blood cell to membrane fraction, RBC:M), 129Xe ventilation, lung perfusion and structural imaging. Longitudinal comparisons (24 vs 52 weeks) and correlations were assessed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank and Spearman9s rank. Results: 23 patients (median age: 68(range: 53-78) years, 87% male) underwent MRI at 23(6-33)(n=13), 54(42-71)(n=18) and 106(98-117)(n=7) weeks after hospital admission. Patients had decreased RBC: M compared to older controls and low transfer factor Z-score at 24, 52 and 106 weeks (median TLCOz<-2.2 at all visits). Ventilation defect percentage was <6% for all patients. There was no longitudinal change (n=8) in 129Xe gas transfer or TLCOz between 24 and 52 weeks. There was a significant decrease in FEV1/FVC Z-score and an increase in FVC Z-score (p=0.018; p=0.043). At 24 and 52 weeks, RBC:M correlated with TLCOz (r=0.661, p=0.038; r=0.709, p=0.015). Conclusion: Xenon gas transfer remains impaired two years post hospitalisation in this cohort. Fig 1: RBC:M alongside healthy control data (57(41-68)years, 67% male).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impaired xenon gas transfer observed two years after COVID-19 hospitalisation in patients with signs of interstitial lung disease
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2023
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.