Late Breaking Abstract - Efficacy of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in older adults with co-existing cardiorespiratory conditions
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction/Aim: RSV can cause severe respiratory disease in older adults with cardiorespiratory conditions. In an ongoing phase 3 placebo-controlled study (NCT04886596), the vaccine efficacy (VE) of RSVPreF3 OA during the first RSV season was 82.6% against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (RSV-LRTD) and 71.7% against RSV-related acute respiratory illness (RSV-ARI) in ≥60-year-olds. We present VE in participants with co-existing cardiorespiratory conditions of interest associated with a higher risk of severe RSV disease outcomes. Methods: Adults ≥60 years were randomized 1:1 and received 1 dose of RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. VE against first RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI episodes was assessed in subgroups of specific interest. Results: Of the 12,467 RSVPreF3 OA and 12,499 placebo recipients, 20.0% and 19.4%, respectively, had ≥1 cardiorespiratory condition of interest. Incidence rates of RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI were higher in placebo recipients with ≥1 cardiorespiratory condition of interest vs those with no medical conditions of interest. VE was 92.1% (RSV-LRTD) and 88.1% (RSV-ARI) (Figure). Conclusion: RSVPreF3 OA is efficacious against RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI in ≥60-year-olds with cardiorespiratory conditions of interest, a population who may benefit the most from protection against RSV. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Late Breaking Abstract - Efficacy of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in older adults with co-existing cardiorespiratory conditions
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2023
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.