The impact of tricuspid regurgitation on the non-invasive assessment of stroke volume derived from cardiac magnetic resonance in pulmonary hypertension
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Stroke volume (SV) has emerged as a prognostic marker in pulmonary arterial hypertension (Humbert M et al. Eur Heart J 2023;61: 2200879). It has been reported that SV derived non-invasively from left ventricular volumes with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) shows good agreement with the gold standard method direct Fick (Mauritz GJ et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 5;10:51). Whether such agreement holds true across different degrees of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is still unclear. Aim: Assess the impact of tricuspid regurgitation on the accuracy of CMR-derived SV measured by left ventricular volumes compared to the gold-standard Fick method, in pulmonary hypertension patients. Methods: 50 PH patients (62% group 1, 20% group 4, 12% group 2, 6% group 3) underwent CMR within 24 hours from RHC between 05/2022 and 01/2023. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the degree of agreement between direct Fick and CMR. Results: For SV by CMR vs direct Fick in patients without or with mild TR mean difference was -1.9 mL, with limits of agreement of -5.9 mL and 2.1 mL. For SV by CMR vs direct Fick in patients with moderate/severe TR mean difference was -1.2 mL, with limits of agreement of -4.4 mL and 2 mL. Conclusions: SV measurements derived from left ventricular volumes on CMR agree well with direct Fick measurements irrespective of the degree of TR.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The impact of tricuspid regurgitation on the non-invasive assessment of stroke volume derived from cardiac magnetic resonance in pulmonary hypertension
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2023
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.