Charcot-Leyden crystals are associated with airway autoimmune responses in severe asthma
Résumé fourni par la source
Rationale: Airway autoantibodies induce histone-coated eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs). EETs are associated with free eosinophil granules (FEGs) and galectin-10 which autocrystallize ex vivo to form Charcot-Leyden crystals (CLCs). Objective: To investigate cytokines and autoimmune responses in patients with CLCs. Methods: Between 2020-2022, CLCs and cell differentials were routinely reported for processed sputum. Cell-free supernatants were assessed for antinuclear antibodies (HUMAN Diagnostics, PMID 28751233), cytokines (EllaTM, Protein Simple), and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs): high mobility box group 1 (HMGB1) and galectin-10 proteins (Novus Biologicals). Results: CLCs were reported in 61/3075 (2%) processed sputa slides (protocol: PMID 8804934). All 46 CLC+ samples with adequate volume and confirmed severe asthma diagnosis were eosinophilic (≥3% eos±FEGs) and comprised the Eos+CLC+ group. Additionally, Eos+CLC- (n=53) and Eos-CLC- (n=32) were included for analysis. Eos+CLC+ had increased ANAs vs CLC- groups (P<0.005, Fig 1A). Reactivities against anti-histone IgG were higher in Eos+CLC+ (96%) vs. Eos-CLC- (30%) (Fig 1B). Eos+CLC+ had higher T2 inflammation (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, P<0.05), HMGB1 (Fig 1C), and decreased trend for “free” galactin-10 compared to CLC- sputa. Conclusions: We report that severe asthma patients with CLCs have high autoimmune burden marked by DAMPs and autoantibodies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Charcot-Leyden crystals are associated with airway autoimmune responses in severe asthma
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2023
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.