Large-scale LOD1 building extraction from a textured 3D mesh of a scene
Le résumé fourni par la source
We propose a novel deep learning approach which performs building semantic segmentation of large-scale textured 3D meshes, followed by a polygonal extraction of footprints and heights. Extracting accurate individual building structures poses a challenge due to the complexity and the variety of architecture and urban designs, where a single overhead image is not enough. Integrating elevation data from a 3D mesh allows to better distinguish individual buildings in three-dimensional space. Another advantage is to avoid occlusion issues in the case of oblique imagery, where tall buildings mask smaller buildings behind them in the case of non-nadir images (especially problematic in urban areas). The proposed method transforms the input data from a 3D textured mesh to a true orthorectified RGB image by rendering both the color information and the depth information from a virtual camera looking straight down. Depth information is then converted to a normalized DSM (nDSM) by subtracting the Copernicus GDEM v3 30-meter Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Viewing the 3D textured mesh as a four-band raster image (RGB + nDSM) allows us to use a very efficient fully convolutional neural network based on the U-net architecture for processing large-scale areas. The proposed method was evaluated on three urban areas in Brazil, America, and France. It allows a fourfold improvement in productivity for cartography of buildings in complex urban areas.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Large-scale LOD1 building extraction from a textured 3D mesh of a scene
- Date Crossref
- 19/10/2023
- Éditeur
- SPIE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.