Structure Characteristics and Removal Behavior of the Deposited Carbon on Ni-Al2O3 Catalyst for CO2 Reforming of CH4
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Four catalysts were prepared in our previous work using the solution combustion method, incipient-wetness impregnation method, colloid mill circulating impregnation method, and hydrothermal-precipitation method, respectively, labeled as SCM, IMP, T310, and HTP. And the performance (stability) of the four catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4 was investigated at 800 °C. In this paper, the composition and structure characteristics of the deposited carbon on the above four catalysts were tested through TEM, Raman, TPH, and TG-DTG technologies. The results showed that filamentous carbon was the primary type of carbon deposition on the catalysts, and a large amount of accumulated carbon would block the catalyst pores, affecting the catalytic performance. The carbon deposited on the catalyst prepared using the hydrothermal-precipitation method calcined at 800 °C exhibited a high degree of graphitization, and the proportion of graphitized carbon was considerable, which is harmful to the stability of the catalyst. The decarburization temperature of the deposited carbon on the four catalysts was mainly in the range of 500–700 °C. Using the Coats–Redfern model, as the reaction order was set as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the decarburization activation energy ranged between 50 and 80 kJ/mol.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Structure Characteristics and Removal Behavior of the Deposited Carbon on Ni-Al2O3 Catalyst for CO2 Reforming of CH4
- Date Crossref
- 13/10/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.