Ecosystem Evapotranspiration Partitioning and Its Spatial–Temporal Variation Based on Eddy Covariance Observation and Machine Learning Method

Le résumé fourni par la source

Partitioning evapotranspiration (ET) into vegetation transpiration (T) and soil evaporation (E) is challenging, but it is key to improving the understanding of plant water use and changes in terrestrial ecosystems. Considering that the transpiration of vegetation at night is minimal and can be negligible, we established a machine learning model (i.e., extreme gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost)) for soil evaporation estimation based on night-time evapotranspiration observation data from eddy covariance towers, remote sensing data, and meteorological reanalysis data. Daytime T was consequently calculated as the difference between the total evapotranspiration and predicted daytime soil evaporation. The soil evaporation estimation model was validated based on the remaining night-time ET data (i.e., model test dataset), the non-growing season ET data of the natural ecosystem, and ET data during the fallow periods of croplands. The validation results showed that XGBoost had a better performance in E estimation, with the average overall accuracy of NSE 0.657, R 0.806, and RMSE 11.344 W/m2. The average annual T/ET of the examined ten ecosystems was 0.50 ± 0.08, with the highest value in deciduous broadleaf forests (0.68 ± 0.11), followed by mixed forests (0.61 ± 0.04), and the lowest in croplands (0.40 ± 0.08). We further examined the impact of the leaf area index (LAI) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) on the variation in T/ET. Overall, at the interannual scale, LAI contributed 28% to the T/ET variation, while VPD had a small (5%) influence. On a seasonal scale, LAI also exerted a stronger impact (1~90%) on T/ET compared to VPD (1~77%). Our study suggests that the XGBoost machine learning model has good performance in ET partitioning, and this method is mainly data-driven without prior knowledge, which may provide a simple and valuable method in global ET partitioning and T/ET estimation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.