Intra‐oral Parotid Duct Exploration and Ductoplasty for Large Parotid Duct Stones: How We Do It
Rattachement africain : ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Salivary duct stones are a common occurrence, most frequently found in the submandibular gland. A smaller proportion of stones can be found in the parotid system (5%–10%). Saliva drains from the parotid gland via Stensen's duct, which emerges from the anterior surface of the parotid gland, superficial to the masseter muscle. At the anterior border of the masseter muscle, it pierces the buccopharyngeal fascia and continues in the submucosa to enter the oral cavity at the papilla lateral to the second upper molar. It is approximately 4-cm long, with a diameter of 2–3 mm. \n Sialoendoscopy has gained popularity over the past number of years to extract proximal duct stones, however, larger impacted stones may not be amendable to this approach and pose a clinical dilemma for surgeons. For these patients a trans-facial approach may be advocated, or even a parotidectomy can be required. Both of these approaches can be challenging and are significantly invasive, not least associated with cosmetically unsightly scars and also a risk of facial nerve injury. \n This article demonstrates an alternative approach of intra-oral parotid duct exploration and ductoplasty technique for large impacted parotid duct stones. This technique is particularly suitable for difficult cases following unsuccessful sialoendoscopy, and as an alternative to the trans-facial approach.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intra‐oral Parotid Duct Exploration and Ductoplasty for Large Parotid Duct Stones: How We Do It
- Date Crossref
- 04/10/2023
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.