Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Patients with Corpus Atrophic Gastritis: A Retrospective Study
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Corpus Atrophic Gastritis (CAG) is characterised by iron malabsorption leading to iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), which rarely responds to oral therapy. Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), shown to be a safe and effective intravenous iron therapy in other diseases, has not been investigated yet in CAG. Thus, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of FCM in CAG-related IDA. A retrospective study on 91 patients identified CAG as the only cause of IDA treated with FCM. Twenty-three were excluded for incomplete follow-up. Sixty-eight were evaluated for safety and efficacy, while three were evaluated for safety only due to infusion interruption for side effects. Haemoglobin and iron storage were evaluated pre-infusion (T0), at 4 weeks (T4) and 12 weeks (T12) after infusion. An eventual IDA relapse was analysed. Two cases reported mild side effects. Haemoglobin significantly increased at T4, and T12, reaching +3.1 g/dL. Ferritin increased at T4, decreasing at T12, while transferrin saturation increased progressively until reaching a plateau. IDA relapsed in 55.4% of patients at a mean of 24.6 months. The only factor associated with relapse was female gender [OR (95% CI): 6.6 (1.5-28.6)]. FCM proved to be safe and effective in treating CAG-related IDA, ensuring quick and long-lasting recovery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Patients with Corpus Atrophic Gastritis: A Retrospective Study
- Date Crossref
- 28/09/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.