Microvascular Free Flap Outcomes in Maxillectomy Defects from Invasive Fungal Sinusitis

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: Microvascular free tissue transfer is routinely used for reconstructing midface defects in patients with malignancy, however, studies regarding reconstructive outcomes in invasive fungal sinusitis (IFS) are lacking. We aim to describe outcomes of free flap reconstruction for IFS defects, determine the optimal time to perform reconstruction, and if anti-fungal medications or other risk factors of an immunocompromised patient population affect reconstructive outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of reconstruction for IFS (2010-2022). Age, BMI, hemoglobin A1c, number of surgical debridements, and interval from the last debridement to reconstruction were compared between patients with delayed wound healing versus those without. Predictor variables for delayed wound healing and the effect of time on free flap reconstruction were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent free flap reconstruction for IFS. Three patients were immunocompromised from leukemia and 21 had diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients underwent an average of four surgical debridements for treatment of IFS. The interval from the last IFS debridement to flap reconstruction was 5.58 months (±5.5). Seven flaps (25.9%) had delayed wound healing. A shorter interval of less than 2 months between the last debridement for IFS and reconstructive free flap procedure was associated with delayed wound healing (Fisher Exact Test p = 0.0062). Other factors including DM, BMI, HgA1c, and bone reconstruction were not associated with delayed wound healing. CONCLUSION: Patients with maxillectomy defects from IFS can undergo microvascular-free flap reconstruction with good outcomes while on anti-fungal medication. Early reconstruction in the first 2 months after the last IFS debridement is associated with delayed wound healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1642-1647, 2024.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.