Anti-S-layer monoclonal antibodies impact C. difficile physiology
Rattachement africain : fr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Clostridioides difficile ( C. difficile ), a gram-positive anaerobic and spore-forming bacterium, is the leading cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea in adults and is characterized by high levels of recurrence and mortality. Surface-layer Protein A (SlpA), the most expressed protein on bacterial surface, plays a crucial role in the early stages of infection although its role in C. difficile physiology is yet to be fully understood. Anti-S-layer antibodies have been identified in the sera of convalescent patients and correlate with improved outcome of C. difficile infection (CDI). However, the precise mechanisms of how anti-S-layer antibodies can confer protection to the host remain unknown. In this study, we report the first monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting S-layer of the reference strain 630. Characterization of these mAbs unravels important roles for S-layer protein in growth, toxin secretion, and biofilm formation with, surprisingly, opposite effects of different anti-SlpA mAbs on these functions. One anti-SlpA mAb impaired C. difficile growth and restored sensitivity to lysozyme-induced lysis. These findings suggest that anti-S-layer antibody responses may include protective and detrimental effects for the host and provide important insights for designing adequate S-layer-targeting therapeutics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Anti-S-layer monoclonal antibodies impact <i>C. difficile</i> physiology
- Date Crossref
- 21/09/2023
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.