Systems biology platform for efficient development and translation of multitargeted therapeutics

Le résumé fourni par la source

Failure to achieve efficacy is among the top, if not the most common reason for clinical trial failures. While there may be many underlying contributors to these failures, selecting the right mechanistic hypothesis, the right dose, or the right patient population are the main culprits. Systems biology is an inter-disciplinary field at the intersection of biology and mathematics that has the growing potential to increase probability of success in clinical trials, delivering a data-driven matching of the right mechanism to the right patient, at the right dose. Moreover, as part of successful selection of targets for a therapeutic area, systems biology is a prime approach to development of combination therapies to combating complex diseases, where single targets have failed to achieve sufficient efficacy in the clinic. Systems biology approaches have become increasingly powerful with the progress in molecular and computational methods and represent a novel innovative tool to tackle the complex mechanisms of human disease biology, linking it to clinical phenotypes and optimizing multiple steps of drug discovery and development. With increasing ability of probing biology at a cellular and organ level with omics technologies, systems biology is here to stay and is positioned to be one of the key pillars of drug discovery and development, predicting and advancing the best therapies that can be combined together for an optimal pharmacological effect in the clinic. Here we describe a systems biology platform with a stepwise approach that starts with characterization of the key pathways contributing to the Mechanism of Disease (MOD) and is followed by identification, design, optimization, and translation into the clinic of the best therapies that are able to reverse disease-related pathological mechanisms through one or multiple Mechanisms of Action (MOA).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.