INDIGO: A GLOBAL, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLINDED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF VORASIDENIB VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH RESIDUAL OR RECURRENT GRADE 2 GLIOMA WITH AN IDH1/2 MUTATION

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract AIMS Current treatments grade 2 gliomas are not curative and can be associated with short- and long-term toxicities. Vorasidenib (VOR), an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mutant (m)IDH1/2 enzymes, has shown a tolerable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity in phase 1 studies. METHOD In the phase 3 INDIGO study (NCT04164901), patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to receive VOR 40 mg daily or placebo (PBO) daily in 28-day cycles. Patients were stratified by 1p19q status and baseline tumor size. Key eligibility criteria included: age ≥12; KPS >80; residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH1m or IDH2m oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma; measurable non-enhancing disease; no prior treatment for glioma with most recent surgery 1-5 years from randomization; and not in immediate need of chemotherapy/radiation. Primary endpoint: radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC). Key secondary endpoint: time to next intervention (TTNI). RESULTS As of 06 Sep2022, 331 pts were randomized across 10 countries: 168 to VOR and 163 to PBO. Median PFS by BIRC was 27.7 mos with VOR and 11.1 with PBO (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27, 0.56; 1-sided P=0.000000067). Median TTNI was not reached with VOR and 17.8 mos with PBO (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15, 0.43; 1-sided P=0.000000019). All-grade adverse events (AEs) occurring in >20% pts receiving VOR vs PBO were alanine aminotransferase increased, COVID-19, fatigue, aspartate aminotransferase increase, headache, diarrhea, nausea. Common grade ≥3 AEs (>5%): ALT increased (9.6% vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS VOR significantly improved PFS by BIRC versus PBO with a manageable safety profile. © 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.