miR-92a-3p regulates cisplatin-induced cancer cell death
Résumé fourni par la source
Non-small cell lung cancer is characterized by a dismal prognosis largely owing to inefficient diagnosis and tenacious drug resistance. Therefore, the identification of new molecular determinants underlying sensitivity of cancer cells to existing therapy is of particular importance to develop new effective combinatorial treatment strategy. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small non-coding RNAs, have been established as master regulators of a variety of cellular processes that play a key role in tumor initiation, progression and metastasis. This, along with their widespread deregulation in many distinct cancers, has triggered enthusiasm for miRNAs as novel therapeutic targets for cancer management, in particular in patients with refractory cancers such as those harboring KRAS mutations. In this study, we performed a loss-of-function screening approach to identify miRNAs whose silencing promotes sensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells to cisplatin. Our results showed in particular that antisense oligonucleotides directed against miR-92a-3p, a member of the oncogenic miR-17 ~ 92 cluster, caused the greatest increase in the sensitivity of KRAS-mutated LUAD cells to cisplatin. In addition, we demonstrated that this miRNA finely regulates the apoptotic threshold and the proliferative capacity of various tumor cell lines with distinct genetic alterations. Collectively, these data suggest that targeting miR-92a-3p may serve as an effective strategy to overcome treatment resistance of solid tumors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- miR-92a-3p regulates cisplatin-induced cancer cell death
- Date Crossref
- 13/09/2023
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.