Accès ouvert déclaré
2023
preprint
Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background
Gabriella Agazie, Z. Arzoumanian, Jacob Askew, A. -S. Bak Nielsen, P. T. Baker, A. Berthereau, N. D. R. Bhat, Matteo Bonetti, Paul R. Brook, Rand Burnette, R. N. Caballero, Andrew D Cameron, Robin Case, Shami Chatterjee, Katerina Chatziioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, Siyuan Chen, Tyler Cohen, W. A. Coles, F. Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, M. Curyło, Carlo J. Cutler, Shi Dai, Subhajit Dandapat, Debabrata Deb, M. E. DeCesar, Dallas DeGan, P. B. Demorest, Hong Deng, S. Desai, G. Desvignes, Lankeswar Dey, N. Dhanda-Batra, Timothy Dolch, B. Drachler, C. Dwivedi, Justin A. Ellis, M. Falxa, Yi Feng, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, William Fiore, E. Fonseca, Alessia Franchini, G. E. Freedman, J. R. Gair, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Kyle A. Gersbach, Jürg Glaser, Deborah Cain Good, Boris Goncharov, A. Gopakumar, E. Graikou, J.‐M. Grießmeier, L. Guillemot, K. Gültekin, Y. J. Guo, Yashwant Gupta, Kathrin Grunthal, J. S. Hazboun, Shinnosuke Hisano, George B. Hobbs, Sophie Hourihane, H. Hu, F. Iraci, Kristina Islo, David Izquierdo–Villalba, J. Jang, J. Jawor, Gemma H. Janssen, R. J. Jennings, A. Jessner, A. D. Johnson, Mallory Jones, Bhal Chandra Joshi, A. R. Kaiser, D. L. Kaplan, Faten Mohammed Kareem, Ramesh Karuppusamy, Evan Francis Keane, M. J. Keith, L. Z. Kelley, Matthew T. Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, D. Kharbanda, Tomonosuke Kikunaga, Thibaut Klein, Neel Kolhe, Michael J. Kramer, M. A. Krishnakumar, A. K. Kulkarni, Nima Laal, K. Lackeos, M. T. Lam, William G. Lamb, B. B. Larsen, T. Joseph W. Lazio, K. J. Lee, Yuri Levin, N. Lewandowska, T. B. Littenberg, Kuan Liu, Tingting Liu, Y. Liu, Andrea N. Lommen, Duncan R. Lorimer, M. E. Lower, Jing Luo, Rui Luo, R. S. Lynch, A. G. Lyne, Chung‐Pei Ma, Yogesh Maan, Debra Madison, Robert Main, Richard N. Manchester, Rami Mandow, M. A. Mattson, Alexander McEwen, James W. McKee, M. A. McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, Bradley W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Mitchell B Mickaliger, Matthew T. Miles, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Priyamvada Natarajan, Rowina S Nathan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, I. C. Niţu, K. Nobleson, Stella Koch Ocker, Ken D. Olum, S. Osłowski, D. Perrodin, A. Petiteau, P. Petrov, Nataliya K. Porayko, Andrea Possenti, T. Prabu, S. M. Ransom, Daniel J. Reardon, A. F. Rogers, Craig Russell, A. Samajdar, Sotirios A. Sanidas, Kai Schmitz, Alberto Sesana, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Joseph Simon, Aman Srivastava, B. W. Stappers, Jing Ping Sun, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Keitaro Takahashi, Stephen R. Taylor, Eric Thrane, Nithyanandan Thyagarajan, C. Tiburzi, Lawrence Toomey, Jacob E. Turner, Caner Ünal, Rutger van Haasteren, Joris P. W. Verbiest, Q. Wang, C. A. Witt, L. Wang, Ziwei Wu, Olivia Young, S. Zhang, X. -J. Zhu, Andrew Zic
22Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés
Rattachement africain : de.
Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Australian, Chinese, European, Indian, and North American pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations recently reported, at varying levels, evidence for the presence of a nanohertz gravitational-wave background (GWB). Given that each PTA made different choices in modeling their data, we perform a comparison of the GWB and individual pulsar noise parameters across the results reported from the PTAs that constitute the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA). We show that despite making different modeling choices, there is no significant difference in the GWB parameters that are measured by the different PTAs, agreeing within 1σ. The pulsar noise parameters are also consistent between different PTAs for the majority of the pulsars included in these analyses. We bridge the differences in modeling choices by adopting a standardized noise model for all pulsars and PTAs, finding that under this model there is a reduction in the tension in the pulsar noise parameters. As part of this reanalysis, we “extended” each PTA’s data set by adding extra pulsars that were not timed by that PTA. Under these extensions, we find better constraints on the GWB amplitude and a higher signal-to-noise ratio for the Hellings–Downs correlations. These extensions serve as a prelude to the benefits offered by a full combination of data across all pulsars in the IPTA, i.e., the IPTA’s Data Release 3, which will involve not just adding in additional pulsars but also including data from all three PTAs where any given pulsar is timed by more than a single PTA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.
Où se fait cette recherche
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.
Les sujets associés
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsSeismic Waves and Analysis