Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

Quality and physiological evaluation of tomato subjected to different supplemental lighting systems

19Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Light is a crucial mediator in plants of growth and development, secondary metabolism, and signaling of potentially beneficial phytochemicals. The present study investigated three indoor supplemental light treatments, HPS, LED, and LED+IR, applied during tomato cultivation, in which non-destructive and destructive analyses were performed at two time points to record the physiological responses and effects of these artificial lights on the growth and quality of the produce. An infrared thermometer and thermal cameras were used throughout the experiment to record temperature changes under each growing condition. LED+IR supplemented light showed a decrease in photosynthetic pigments, such as chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoids but induced an increased number of flowers, heavier tomato fruits, enhanced anthocyanins, phenolic index, lipid peroxidation, titratable acidity, and reduced nitrate accumulation. Moreover, higher generated temperatures under LED+IR helped tomato plants to reduce white fly infestation, but suppressed plant height. HPS light performed better than both LED and LED+IR in terms of total sugar accumulation, total carotenoids, water content, plant height, and leaf lipid peroxidation at harvest. Lycopene, ß-carotene, brix index were remarkable under HPS lighting but under the same conditions the number of whiteflies, however, was the highest in HPS among all the tested light treatments. In terms of fruit color analysis, maximum redness (a*), reduced hue angle, and chroma were observed under LED+IR while LED lighting in brightness (L*), and HPS in yellowness (b*) were prominent. However, LED in particular was insufficiently effective in acquiring any possible physiological and qualitative characteristics of tomato plants and fruits for the observed time span of the experiment. Hence, LED+IR has been shown to boost the accumulation of bioactive chemicals, improve fruit quality, promote more rapid and early flowering in tomato plants, and can serve as an efficient replacement for traditional indoor illumination.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Quality and physiological evaluation of tomato subjected to different supplemental lighting systems
Date Crossref
01/01/2024
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Light effects on plantsGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.