New Admissions and Asymptomatic TB Cases fuel TB Epidemic in Prisons, a Cross Sectional Survey in Tanzania
Rattachement africain : Tanzanie, de, gb, bd. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Background There is an increased risk for tuberculosis (TB) infection and disease progression in prison settings. TB prevalence in prisons of high and middle/low income countries have been measured to be between 5 and 50 -times higher than in the general population. Methods We performed TB active case finding in five central prisons, Keko, Segerea, Ukonga, Butimba and Ruanda prison in Tanzania, using the Xpert MTB/RIF ® assay on early morning or spot sputum sample from inmates and new entries between April 2014 and July 2015. Results Out of 13,868 prisoners tested, 13,763 had valid results. TB prevalence was 1.55% (214/13,763); new admissions contributed to the majority (61.68%) of TB cases, but prevalence was higher among inmates (1.75%) compared to new admissions (1.45%). Ukonga, an urban prison which incarcerates long-term convicted inmates had the highest prevalence of 4.02%. Male gender (OR=2.51, p<0.001), repeated incarcerations (OR=2.85, p<0.001), history of TB treatment (OR=1.78, p =0.002), TB symptoms (OR=2.78, p=0.006) and HIV infection (OR=2.86, p=0.002) were associated with positive TB results. Conclusion New admissions could be the driving force of the TB epidemic in the penitentiary system. However, prison environments remain a major risk factor for developing active TB disease.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- New Admissions and Asymptomatic TB Cases fuel TB Epidemic in Prisons, a Cross Sectional Survey in Tanzania
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2023
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.