Mid-term outcomes of temporary medial distal femoral hemiepiphysiodesis with and without medial patellofemoral ligament repair for recurrent patellar instability in skeletally immature patients with genu valgum

Le résumé fourni par la source

Genu valgum contributes to patellar instability, though outcomes following temporary hemiepiphysiodesis via eight plating are less understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and need for additional procedures following temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for the treatment of pediatric genu valgum and patellar instability, as well as evaluating the utility of a concurrent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair. Patients who underwent medial distal femoral epiphysiodesis for the treatment of genu valgum and recurrent patellar instability were identified. Inclusion criteria were minimum 1-year follow-up and lack of concurrent ligamentous reconstruction. Patients were contacted to complete a questionnaire which included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form and questions pertaining to knee function and patient satisfaction. Thirty-one patients aged 12.0 ± 1.9 years underwent 47 guided growth procedures and were included in final analysis. Seventeen knees (36%) required subsequent surgery for patellar instability. All patients requiring subsequent surgery were female, compared with 70% of patients not requiring subsequent surgery ( P = 0.017). The MPFL repair group underwent fewer subsequent procedures to address instability, though this difference was NS (17 vs. 46%, P = 0.318). Mean IKDC score at 5.3 years follow-up among 18 survey respondents was 78.6. Medial distal femoral hemiepiphysiodesis may partially address recurrent patellar instability in skeletally immature patients with genu valgum. Concurrent MPFL repair may minimize the need for subsequent procedures to address recurrent instability. While correcting alignment may be helpful, patients should be aware of the potential need for further patellar instability surgery. Level of evidence: IV, case series.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.