Comparison between standard ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition vs adding an interference screw for flexor carpi radialis fixation. A pilot study
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The traditional ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) procedure requires a trapeziectomy with the reconstruction of the palmar oblique ligament. Introduction of an interference screw (IS) during the tendon interposition is intended to improve tensioning of the beak ligament reconstruction and limit subsidence which may increase stability for the patient postoperatively. Non-inferiority, clinical, blinded, and randomized trial was performed. Twenty patients were randomized to one of the two treatment groups (Standard LRTI vs LRTI + IS). Four patients did not receive surgery during the allotted time. Finally, 16 patients (8 per group) had completed follow-up data at the end of the designated 2-year follow up. Equivalent functional and radiographic outcomes were found. Trapezial height at 2 years was 4.44 mm for standard LRTI and 3.83 mm for LRTI with screw. At the end of the follow up period both groups had comparable grip strength. Mean improvement of DASH score, VAS and EQ5D was similar in both groups, showing good outcomes for both procedures. Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition with and without interference screw has shown equivalent results in a 2-year follow-up related to stability and functional outcomes. Interference screw is a safe and reliable technique with no difference in pain or complication rates. Therapeutic II.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison between standard ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition vs adding an interference screw for flexor carpi radialis fixation. A pilot study
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2023
- Éditeur
- Scientific Scholar
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.