Adult Kawasaki disease: a rare and challenging diagnosis—a case report
Rattachement africain : ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute systemic vasculitis which predominantly occurs in childhood but rarely in adulthood. Diagnosis relies on the presence of typical clinical features; however, patients may present atypically, increasing the challenge of timely diagnosis for physicians. Case summary: We report a case of a 40-year-old male presenting with persistent fever, rash, and unilateral neck swelling. Initial investigations were suggestive of necrotizing lymphadenitis, with a presumed infective aetiology. However, extensive microbiology and immunological investigations remained negative. Cardiac injury was evident with elevated troponin T and NT-proBNP; however, left ventricular systolic function was normal. After 4 days, clinical features consistent with KD were noted and the results of a lymph node biopsy supported this diagnosis. Despite timely treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and high-dose aspirin, follow-up computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography demonstrated two sequential aneurysms (max 6 mm) in the right coronary artery, plus one small subtle aneurysm in the proximal left anterior descending artery (4 mm). Discussion: Diagnosis of adult KD remains challenging, as symptoms often present sequentially over time rather than simultaneously and many of the clinical features necessary for diagnosis share commonality with other infectious disease processes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Adult Kawasaki disease: a rare and challenging diagnosis—a case report
- Date Crossref
- 18/08/2023
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.