Are biomarkers associated with sensitivity to physical activity?

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Activity-based treatments play an integral role in managing musculoskeletal conditions including low back pain. However, while therapeutic exercise has been shown to reduce pain in such conditions, certain individuals experience a paradoxical pain increase in response to exercise. The physiological processes underlying this sensitivity to physical activity (SPA) are not fully understood, however stress and inflammation have been shown to contribute to SPA. The present cross-sectional study investigated whether physiological indicators of stress (cortisol) and inflammation (IL-6) help explain SPA. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with chronic low back pain and 21 healthy controls completed a 1-h exercise session of standardized physical tasks. SPA was calculated from the difference between post- and pre-exercise pain levels. Participant's saliva was collected at several timepoints for cortisol and IL-6 levels quantification. Their waking cortisol response was calculated to reflect their cortisol regulation. Reactivity of IL-6 and cortisol was calculated to reflect changes in these measures during exercise. RESULTS: IL-6 reactivity was significantly and positively correlated with SPA among participants with low back pain. In contrast, neither cortisol waking response nor cortisol reactivity was significantly correlated within the low back pain group. No significant differences in IL-6 reactivity, cortisol reactivity or cortisol waking response were observed. CONCLUSION: These findings are the first to link SPA to an objective biomarker among people with low back pain. These findings help describe the physiological mechanisms of SPA and can support new clinical research that targets the inflammatory response of patients with chronic low-back pain and elevated SPA. SIGNIFICANCE: This study reveals a correlation between SPA and an objective salivary biomarker of IL-6 in people with low back pain, improving our understanding of this clinically relevant subjective experience.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.