Multi-omics and Multi-VOIs to Predict Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy
Rattachement africain : cn, hk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Objective: This study aimed to develop a prediction model for esophageal fistula (EF) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), by integrating multi-omics features from multiple volumes-of-interest (VOIs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pretreatment planning computed tomographic (CT) images, three-dimensional dose distributions, and clinical factors of 287 EC patients. Nine groups of features from different combination of omics [Radiomics (R), Dosiomics (D), and RD (the combination of R and D)], and VOIs [esophagus (ESO), gross tumor volume (GTV), and EG (the combination of ESO and GTV)] were extracted and separately selected by unsupervised and supervised approaches. The final model performance was evaluated using five metrics: average area under the receiver-operator-characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Results: For multi-omics using RD features, the model performance in EG model shows:AUC, 0.817±0.031; 95% CI: 0.805, 0.825; p<0.001, which is better than single VOI (ESO or GTV). Conclusion: Integrating multi-omics features from multi-VOIs enables better prediction of EF in EC patients treated with IMRT. The incorporation of dosiomics features can enhance the model performance of the prediction.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Multi-omics and Multi-VOIs to Predict Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy
- Date Crossref
- 17/08/2023
- Éditeur
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.