Benefits of expanding behavioral health screening in a pediatric diabetes clinic to include anxiety and caregiver reports in youth 12 years and younger.

Résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Depression and anxiety among youth with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with poor diabetes management. Further guidance regarding psychosocial screening measures would benefit pediatric integrated care clinics. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine whether screening for anxiety, assessing caregiver reports, and screening children 12 years old and younger could identify a larger percentage of youth who may benefit from behavioral health support compared to the standard approach of only screening youth 13 and older for depression. METHOD: = 13.2 years; 55.4% females) and their caregivers (75% mothers) completed validated self-report and proxy-report depression and anxiety screeners during routine clinic visits between 2019 and 2021. Twenty-seven youth aged 13-17 also completed a measure of diabetes-related distress. RESULTS: The standard approach of screening youth aged 13-17 for depression via self-report identified 25.6% of participants, whereas screening youth ages 8-17 for depression and anxiety via self- and proxy-reports identified 47.7%. Screening for depression/anxiety identified unique portions of youth independent of diabetes distress. DISCUSSION: Utilizing anxiety and proxy-report measures may identify youth likely to benefit from behavioral health support who are not identified when only a self-report depression measure is used in screening. Research should evaluate whether utilizing multiple measures and screening children under 13 years old improve detection and connection to care for youth experiencing difficulty managing diabetes. Early identification and intervention could subsequently mitigate the negative impacts of social-emotional difficulties on diabetes management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.