Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

P731: SURVIVAL IN LOWER-RISK MDS PATIENTS FROM EUMDS REGISTRY BY TWO TRANSPLANT SELECTION CRITERIA - IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPLANT DECISION

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
28Institutions déclarées
11Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). How to select lower-risk (LR) patients (pts) for transplantation is a matter of debate. The International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS (IWG) defined intermediate IPSS-R risk pts as a higher-risk if IPSS-R score is above 3.5. MDS-RIGHT criteria recommend transplantation in LR-MDS if: very/poor risk cytogenetics, >50% blasts increase from baseline or >15% BM blasts, neutrophils <0.3x109/l, platelets <30x109/l, high transfusion intensity ≥2 units/month for 6 months, progression to higher risk IPSS-R group or drop of platelets >25% in 6 months (MDS Europe. https://www.mds-europe.org). Aims: The primary aim of the study was to compare the survival of LR-MDS pts candidate for transplant by IWG and MDS-RIGHT criteria with non-candidate pts using registry data. The secondary aim was to compare the survival of IWG and MDS-RIGHT registry based cohorts with survival in published transplant cohort. Methods: 2284 pts from the EUMDS registry with LR-MDS (very/low and intermediate risk IPSS-R) were included in the registry based cohort. Survival analysis of pts meeting IWG and MDS-RIGHT criteria at baseline, 6 and 12 months was done in all candidates and those fit for transplantation, defined by Karnofsky ≥70, HCT-CI <3 according to MDS-RIGHT. Systematic review of transplantation studies in MDS was conducted. Published survival from transplant cohort were compared to the registry based cohorts. Results: Number of all and fit [Nall (Nfit, %)] candidates for transplant at baseline, 6 and 12 months was: IWG: 280 (146, 52%), 15 (5, 33%) and 22 (0, 0%); MDS-RIGHT: 182 (97, 53%), 428 (112, 26%) and 125 (39, 31%), respectively. Median OS, PFS and LFS survival in candidate and non-candidate patients at baseline were significantly different (p<0.01). Median OS was: IWG: 2.5 vs 4.6 years; MDS-RIGHT: 3.3 vs 4.6 years (Fig.1A and B). MDS-RIGHT pts with IPSS-R >3.5 (28% of IWG group) shown unfavorable median OS comparing with other pts (1.5 vs 4.8 years, p <0.001, Fig.1C). Published OS of transplanted intermediate IPSS-R risk pts (Scheid et al., BMT 2017) at 12, 24 and 36 months was: 59%, 48%, and 43%. Survival in IWG and MDS-RIGHT pts was better at all time points. MDS-RIGHT pts with IPSS-R >3.5 had higher survival at 1 year (68%) but worse survival at 2 and 3 years (42% and 33%) (p=0.07, Fig.1D). Summary/Conclusion: Both transplant selection criteria identify LR-MDS patients with unfavorable survival. MDS-RIGHT pts with IPSS-R above 3.5 have particularly unfavorable prognosis. There is no clear evidence for upfront transplantation in any of prognostic group.Keywords: Myelodysplastic syndrome, Prognosis, Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P731: SURVIVAL IN LOWER-RISK MDS PATIENTS FROM EUMDS REGISTRY BY TWO TRANSPLANT SELECTION CRITERIA - IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPLANT DECISION
Date Crossref
01/08/2023
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.