Cost of implementing the QualityRights programme in public hospitals in Gujarat providing mental healthcare
Rattachement africain : in, au, ch, ca, cl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background & objectives: Investment in mental health is quite meagre worldwide, including in India. The costs of new interventions must be clarified to ensure the appropriate utilization of available resources. The government of Gujarat implemented QualityRights intervention at six public mental health hospitals. This study was aimed to project the costs of scaling up of the Gujarat QualityRights intervention to understand the additional resources needed for a broader implementation. Methods: Economic costs of the QualityRights intervention were calculated using an ingredients-based approach from the health systems' perspective. Major activities within the QualityRights intervention included assessment visits, meetings, training of trainers, provision of peer support and onsite training. Results: Total costs of implementing the QualityRights intervention varied from Indian Rupees (₹) 0.59 million to ₹ 2.59 million [1United States Dollars (US $) = ₹ 74.132] across six intervention sites at 2020 prices with 69-79 per cent of the cost being time cost. Scaling up the intervention to the entire State of Gujarat would require about two per cent increase in financial investment, or about 7.5 per cent increase in total cost including time costs over and above the costs of usual care for people with mental health conditions in public health facilities across the State. Interpretation & conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that human resources were the major cost contributor of the programme. Given the shortage of trained human resources in the mental health sector, appropriate planning during the scale-up phase of the QualityRights intervention is required to ensure all staff members receive the required training, and the treatment is not compromised during this training phase. As only about two per cent increase in financial cost can improve the quality of mental healthcare significantly, the State government can plan for its scale-up across the State.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cost of implementing the QualityRights programme in public hospitals in Gujarat providing mental healthcare
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2023
- Éditeur
- Scientific Scholar
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Manipal Academy of Higher Education pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
UNSW Sydney pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
George Institute for Global Health Department of Research pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Indian Law Institute pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
World Health Organization pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Government of Gujarat pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
B.J. Medical College pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Toronto pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Public Health Ontario pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Government Medical College Department of Psychiatry pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, UNSW Sydney et Department of Research — George Institute for Global Health, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.