KCL TEST: an open-source inspired asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 surveillance programme in an academic institution
Rattachement africain : gb, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Testing was paramount in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our university established KCL TEST: a SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic testing programme that enabled sensitive and accessible PCR testing of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in saliva. We performed 158,277 PCRs for our staff, students, and their household contacts, free of charge. Our average turnaround time was 16h and 37 mins from user registration to result delivery. KCL TEST combined open-source automation and in house non-commercial reagents, which allows for rapid deployment. Here we provide our blueprint, recently recommended for ISO15189 accreditation, and results to enable the rapid launch of diagnostic laboratories where and when needed, particularly in low-resource settings. Our data span over 18 months and parallels that of the UK Office for National Statistics, with a lower positive rate and virtually no delta wave. Our observations strongly support regular asymptomatic community testing to decrease outbreaks and provide safe working spaces. Universities can therefore provide agile, resilient, and accurate testing that reflects the infection rate and trend of the general population. We call for the integration of academic institutions in pandemic preparedness, with capabilities to rapidly deploy highly skilled staff, as well as develop, test and accommodate efficient low-cost pipelines.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- KCL TEST: an open-source inspired asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 surveillance programme in an academic institution
- Date Crossref
- 27/07/2023
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.