SuperTIGER Ultra-Heavy Galactic Cosmic Ray Atmospheric Propagation Corrections and Validation
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The SuperTIGER (Super Trans-Iron Galactic Element Recorder) balloon-borne ultra-heavy Galactic cosmic-ray (UHGCR) detector had successful Antarctic flights in 2012 (55 days) and 2019 (32 days). Stratospheric float altitudes varied between ∼120,000 – 130,000 ft, and measurements must be corrected for propagation through the residual ∼ 0.5% atmosphere using an approach developed for the preceding TIGER instrument. Changes due to nuclear interactions are determined iteratively starting from assumed top of the atmosphere (TOA) elemental abundances from which instrument abundances are found by solving networks of equations for all elements with partial and total charge changing cross sections stepping through fine slabs of material and adjusting the TOA abundances after each run until the predicted instrument abundances match the flight measurements. Differential elemental atmospheric energy losses are corrected for using Geant4 simulations to find TOA minimum energies corresponding to the acrylic Cherenkov detector threshold (∼350 MeV/nuc) and scaling TOA abundances corrected for nuclear interactions with the fraction of the integral energy spectrum for its TOA minimum energy, using the iron spectrum for the UHGCR. Top of instrument (TOI) abundance at each element is then obtained from using total charge changing cross section and scaled partial charge changing cross sections to propagate TOA abundance through the fine slabs of material.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- SuperTIGER Ultra-Heavy Galactic Cosmic Ray Atmospheric Propagation Corrections and Validation
- Date Crossref
- 18/08/2023
- Éditeur
- Sissa Medialab
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.