Recurrence quantification analysis of postural sway in patients with persistent postural perceptual dizziness

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a common cause of chronic dizziness and imbalance. Emerging evidence suggests that changes in quantitative measures of postural control may help identify individuals with PPPD, however, traditional linear metrics of sway have yielded inconsistent results. Methodologies to examine the temporal structure of sway, including recurrent quantification analysis (RQA), have identified unique changes in dynamic structure of postural control in other patient populations. This study aimed to determine if adults with PPPD exhibit changes in the dynamic structure of sway and whether this change is modulated on the basis of available sensory cues. Methods: Twelve adults diagnosed with PPPD and twelve age-matched controls, completed a standard battery of quiet stance balance tasks that involved the manipulation of visual and/or proprioceptive feedback. For each group, the regularity and complexity of the CoP signal was assessed using RQA and the magnitude and variability of the CoP signal was quantified using traditional linear measures. Results: An overall effect of participant group (i.e., healthy controls vs. PPPD) was seen for non-linear measures of temporal complexity quantified using RQA. Changes in determinism (i.e., regularity) were also modulated on the basis of availability of sensory cues in patients with PPPD. No between-group difference was identified for linear measures assessing amount and variability of sway. Conclusions: Participants with PPPD on average exhibited sway that was similar in magnitude to, but significantly more repeatable and less complex than, healthy controls. These data show that non-linear measures provide unique information regarding the effect of PPPD on postural control, and as a result, may serve as potential rehabilitation outcome measures.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.