Impact of the peripheral blood inflammatory indices and modified nomogram-revised risk index on survival of Extranodal Nasal-Type Natural Killer/T-Cell lymphoma

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: At present, peripheral blood markers are easily accessible information and clinically valuable prognostic indicators in extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL). Nevertheless, the role of its comprehensive score in ENKTCL remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of the peripheral inflammation score on ENKTCL. METHODS: The retrospective study included 183 patients with ENKTCL. Univariate Cox regression analyses and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression were used to construct the inflammation-related prognostic index named Risk. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and regression adjustment with propensity score matching (PSM) were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of risk. The performance of the modified nomogram-revised risk index (NRI) by integrating risk was evaluated with the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and integrated Brier score (IBS). RESULTS: The risk cut-off value, constructed by the lymphocyte count, platelet count, albumin level, LMR, and PNI, was -1.3486. Before PSM, multivariate analysis showed that risk was significantly associated with OS (HR = 2.577, 95% CI = 1.614-4.114, P< 0.001) and PFS (HR = 2.679, 95% CI = 1.744-4.114, P< 0.001). After PSM adjustment, risk was still an independent factor for OS (HR = 2.829, 95% CI = 1.601-5.001, P< 0.001) and PFS (HR = 2.877, 95% CI = 1.735-4.770, P< 0.001). With the NRI, the modified NRI by integrating risk increased the AUC and clinical net benefit and decreased the IBS. CONCLUSIONS: Risk is an easily accessible and inexpensive indicator that may be used as a prognostic marker and could improve NRI predictive power in patients with ENKTCL.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.