Aller au contenu principal
2023 article

1528 IMPROVING DISCUSSION SURROUNDING RESUSCITATION IN OLDER PATIENTS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction One in three hospitalised patients die within 12 months of admission, rising to 45.6% in individuals aged 85 and older. Resuscitation is rarely successful in this patient group. Most older persons are happy to engage in discussions regarding resuscitation and patients’ and relatives’ involvement is recommended by British Geriatrics Society, General Medical Council and Royal College of Physicians. We aimed to increase the number of resuscitation and escalation of care discussions across our Ageing and Complex Medicine department to 90% by November 2022. Method Retrospective review of randomly selected electronic case notes for patients discharged in August 2021, November 2021, March 2022 and August 2022, and November 2022, to determine when resuscitation was discussed and, if not discussed, the reasons why. Interventions included: 1. face-to-face presentation of findings with discussion at departmental teaching, 2. distribution of posters on each ward, 3. discussion between each ward team, to review individual wards results. Results 388 patient cases were reviewed over 5 data collection cycles. At baseline, in August 2021, 49% patients had discussion surrounding resuscitation, increasing to 69% following intervention 1 (November 2021) and 79% following intervention 2 (March 2022). Follow up in August 2022 showed this increase was not sustained, falling to 64%. After intervention 3 (Nov 2022) this rose again to 72%. August 2022 data was evaluated to identify reasons behind no discussion. The main reason was ‘good baseline’ (31.1%) with no documented reason in 48.3% cases. Conclusion Percentage of resuscitation discussions has fluctuated over time, improving following targeted intervention but has not yet reached 90%. The main barriers to success identified included junior doctor change-over, fast patient flow, competing ward priorities and patients/relatives lack of understanding. We hope to integrate teaching regarding resuscitation into our departmental induction, to sustain knowledge and understanding within the workforce.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
1528 IMPROVING DISCUSSION SURROUNDING RESUSCITATION IN OLDER PATIENTS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL
Date Crossref
01/07/2023
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.