Ultrastructural analysis of the intracellular surfactant in lungs of healthy and ovalbumin sensitized and challenged Brown Norway rats

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: In human and experimentally induced asthma, a dysfunction of the intra-alveolar-surface active agent (surfactant) has been demonstrated. Type II alveolar epithelial cells (AEII) synthesize, secrete and recycle surfactant. Prior to secretion, intracellular surfactant is stored in specific secretory organelles of AEII. The lamellar bodies (Lb) represent its ultrastructural correlate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether disturbances of the intra-alveolar surfactant are accompanied by alterations in the intracellular surfactant.Material and Methods: Brown-Norway rats were sensitized twice with ovalbumin (OVA) and heat killed Bordetella pertussis bacilli. During airway challenge, an aerosol of 5% ovalbumin/saline solution (0.25 l/min) was nebulized. 24 h after airway challenge, lungs were fixed by vascular perfusion. AEII and their Lb were characterized stereologically by light and electron microscopy.Results: In both groups, AEII were structurally intact. The number of AEII per lung and their number-weighted mean volume did not differ (controls: 49 × 106, 393 µm3; asthmatics: 44 × 106, 390 µm3). A mean of 90 Lb in AEII of asthmatics and of 93 Lb in AEII of controls were evaluated. The Lb mean total volume was 59 µm in asthmatics and 68 µm in controls. Values of both parameters did not reach significance. Also, the size distribution and mean volume of Lb was not influenced by asthma induction, because the volume weighted mean volume of Lb (2.18 µm in asthmatics compared to 1.87 µm in controls) and the numerical weighted mean volume (0.96 µm in asthmatics and 0.75 µm in controls) were comparable in both groups.Conclusion: The obtained results suggest that asthma-induced surfactant dysfunction is not related to disturbances in the intracellular surfactant´s ultrastructural correlates.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.