Reconstruction and completion of high-resolution 3D cardiac shapes using anisotropic CMRI segmentations and continuous implicit neural representations

Le résumé fourni par la source

Since the onset of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging, voxel-based segmentation has emerged as the primary methodology for automatic analysis of left ventricle (LV) function and morphology in cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMRI). In standard clinical practice, simultaneous multi-slice 2D cine short-axis MR imaging is performed under multiple breath-holds resulting in highly anisotropic 3D images. Furthermore, sparse-view CMRI often lacks whole heart coverage caused by large slice thickness and often suffers from inter-slice misalignment induced by respiratory motion. Therefore, these volumes only provide limited information about the true 3D cardiac anatomy which may hamper highly accurate assessment of functional and anatomical abnormalities. To address this, we propose a method that learns a continuous implicit function representing 3D LV shapes by training an auto-decoder. For training, high-resolution segmentations from cardiac CT angiography are used. The ability of our approach to reconstruct and complete high-resolution shapes from manually or automatically obtained sparse-view cardiac shape information is evaluated by using paired high- and low-resolution CMRI LV segmentations. The results show that the reconstructed LV shapes have an unconstrained subvoxel resolution and appear smooth and plausible in through-plane direction. Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis reveals that reconstructed high-resolution ventricle volumes are closer to the corresponding reference volumes than reference low-resolution volumes with bias of [limits of agreement] -3.51 [-18.87, 11.85] mL, and 12.96 [-10.01, 35.92] mL respectively. Finally, the results demonstrate that the proposed approach allows recovering missing shape information and can indirectly correct for limited motion-induced artifacts.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.