Spatial distribution of BOLD activations evoked by three different tastants to build a chemotopic map of primary gustatory area: A pilot study

Le résumé fourni par la source

The gustatory areas of the brain include the primary (GI) and the secondary (GII) gustatory cerebral cortex. A spatial mechanism has been recently hypothesized to explain the taste quality recognition. This research investigates the spatial distribution of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activations evoked in the human area GI by different tastants, aimed at building a chemotopic map. The chemotopic organization of the human GI was studied in seven healthy subjects by applying three taste stimuli (salty, sweet, neutral) to either side of the tongue, using a 5-min functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) block-designed protocol, alternating periods of rest and stimulation. Data were analyzed by the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) Software Library (FSL). Unilateral tongue stimulation consistently evoked bilateral activation in area GI. Ipsilateral foci were generally larger and signal increases greater. The foci evoked by each tastant exhibited slightly but not significantly different mean coordinates, broad overlap and high interindividual variability; the salty stimuli generally evoked more anterior foci and sweet stimuli more posterior activation. Results confirm that the gustatory pathways from tongue to cortex are bilaterally distributed, with an ipsilateral predominance. Although distinct GI zones were activated by the different taste stimuli, a clear topographical organization could not be recognized. Possibly, fMRI technique is unable to resolve fine topographical arrangements or GI discriminative role for different tastants is subserved by another mechanism. Bilateral activation of the primary somatosensory area in the parietal cortex (contralateral predominance) and of middle insula (ipsilateral predominance) were also observed.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.