Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Interstitial Lung Disease Patterns from CT Images via Self-Training with Selective Re-Training

Résumé fourni par la source

Accurate segmentation of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patterns from computed tomography (CT) images is an essential prerequisite to treatment and follow-up. However, it is highly time-consuming for radiologists to pixel-by-pixel segment ILD patterns from CT scans with hundreds of slices. Consequently, it is hard to obtain large amounts of well-annotated data, which poses a huge challenge for data-driven deep learning-based methods. To alleviate this problem, we propose an end-to-end semi-supervised learning framework for the segmentation of ILD patterns (ESSegILD) from CT images via self-training with selective re-training. The proposed ESSegILD model is trained using a large CT dataset with slice-wise sparse annotations, i.e., only labeling a few slices in each CT volume with ILD patterns. Specifically, we adopt a popular semi-supervised framework, i.e., Mean-Teacher, that consists of a teacher model and a student model and uses consistency regularization to encourage consistent outputs from the two models under different perturbations. Furthermore, we propose introducing the latest self-training technique with a selective re-training strategy to select reliable pseudo-labels generated by the teacher model, which are used to expand training samples to promote the student model during iterative training. By leveraging consistency regularization and self-training with selective re-training, our proposed ESSegILD can effectively utilize unlabeled data from a partially annotated dataset to progressively improve the segmentation performance. Experiments are conducted on a dataset of 67 pneumonia patients with incomplete annotations containing over 11,000 CT images with eight different lung patterns of ILDs, with the results indicating that our proposed method is superior to the state-of-the-art methods.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.