Long-term outcomes of Baerveldt glaucoma implant surgery in Japanese patients
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract This study evaluated the long-term surgical outcomes of Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) surgery in patients with refractory glaucoma (233 eyes/204 patients). Surgical failure was defined by: <20% reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), or criterion A (IOP > 21 mmHg), criterion B (IOP > 17 mmHg), or criterion C (IOP > 14 mmHg). Reoperation, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony also denoted failure. The probability of success at 5 years postoperatively using criteria A, B, and C was 71.5%, 48.4%, and 22.0%, respectively. The mean IOP decreased significantly from 32.8 ± 9.4 mmHg preoperatively to 13.4 ± 4.1 mmHg at 5 years; the mean number of glaucoma medications also decreased from 3.7 ± 1.2 to 1.9 ± 1.9 (both P < 0.01). The number of previous intraocular surgeries was significantly associated with failure in the multivariable analysis for criterion B (hazard ratio: 1.28; P < 0.01). Early and late postoperative complications occurred in 93 (39.9%) and 33 (14.2%) eyes, respectively. Postoperative interventions were performed in 55 eyes (23.6%). BGI surgery resulted in significant long-term decreases in IOP and the number of glaucoma medications. BGI surgery is effective for refractory glaucoma. However, postoperative interventions due to complications are required in numerous cases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-term outcomes of Baerveldt glaucoma implant surgery in Japanese patients
- Date Crossref
- 06/07/2023
- Éditeur
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.