Frailty detection in older adults via fractal analysis of acceleration signals from wrist-worn sensors
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: Frailty is a reversible multidimensional syndrome that puts older people at a high risk of adverse health outcomes. It has been proposed to emerge from the dysregulation of the complex system dynamics of physiologic control systems. We propose the analysis of the fractal complexity of hand movements as a new method to detect frailty in older adults. Methods: FRAIL scale and Fried's phenotype scores were calculated for 1209 subjects-72.4 (5.2) y.o. 569 women-and 1279 subjects-72.6 (5.3) y.o. 604 women-in the pubicly available NHANES 2011-2014 data set, respectively. The fractal complexity of their hand movements was assessed with a detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) of their accelerometry records and a logistic regression model for frailty detection was fit. Results: ). The AUC of the logistic classifier was moderate (AUC with complexity = 0.69 vs. AUC without complexity = 0.67). Conclusion: Frailty can be characterized in this data set with the Fried phenotype. Non-dominant hand movements in free-living conditions are fractal processes regardless of age or frailty level and its complexity can be quantified with the exponent of a power law. Higher levels of complexity loss are associated with higher levels of frailty. This association is not strong enough to justify the use of complexity loss after adjusting for sex, age, and multimorbidity.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Frailty detection in older adults via fractal analysis of acceleration signals from wrist-worn sensors
- Date Crossref
- 27/06/2023
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.