Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

One-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting with radial artery graft in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective. To analyze one-year clinical outcomes and radial artery (RA) graft patency in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD). Material and Methods. A retrospective study enrolled 149 patients with diffuse CAD who underwent CABG between April 2020 and April 2021. RA graft was used in 58 patients (group 1). Other ones (n=91) comprised the 2nd group (conventional CABG using left mammary artery (MA) and saphenous veins). Decision making on the right mammary artery grafting was individual. We created propensity score-matched (PSM) pairs without replacement (1:1 match) (49 patients in each group). All eligible patients underwent CT-angiography in about 12 months after surgery (n=61, 62.2%). We visualized 229 coronary grafts including 103 arterial grafts (left MA 61, right MA 12, RA 30) and 126 venous grafts. Clinical outcomes and angiography data were analyzed. Results. Preoperative clinical and demographical data were similar after PSM. Males prevailed (87.8% and 83.7%, respectively). Mean age was similar (60.7±8.3 and 63.2±9.2 years, respectively). Aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass time, as well as revascularization index were similar. There was only 1 postoperative myocardial infarction with unfavorable outcome in the 2nd group. No major cardiovascular events were found in the 1st group. Annual incidence of myocardial infarction was comparable (2.1% vs 4.3%). Angina recurrence was diagnosed in 10.6 and 15.2% of patients, respectively. CT-angiography revealed 2.4-fold higher incidence of venous graft dysfunction compared to arterial grafts (11.1% vs 3.9%; OR=2.4, 95% CI 0.8—7.4, p=0.096) and 1.4-fold higher incidence compared to RA grafts (11.1% vs 6.7%; OR=1.4, 95% CI 0.3—6.0, p=0.623). Conclusion. CABG with RA grafts demonstrates satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with diffuse CAD. Analysis of benefits of RA grafts over venous grafts requires further investigations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
One-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting with radial artery graft in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease
Date Crossref
24/04/2023
Éditeur
Media Sphere Publishing House
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • National Medical Research Center of Cardiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Chazov National Medical Research Centre of Cardiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology et Chazov National Medical Research Centre of Cardiology.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.