Resting on Their Laureates? Research Productivity Among Winners of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is the most prestigious and coveted award in medical research.Anecdotal evidence and related research suggest that receiving it may adversely affect research productivity.We compared the post-Nobel research output of laureates (prize years: 1950-2010) with their pre-Nobel output and with the output of a matched control group consisting of winners of the Lasker Award, another highly prestigious medical research prize.Pre-Nobel, laureates' publications were more voluminous, highly cited, and novel than those of (future) Lasker winners.Post-Nobel, laureates' productivity decreased sharply, eventually falling below that of Lasker winners on all three measures.These declines may reflect diversionary effects of the Prize, changed incentives, or intrinsically different career arcs for medical researchers who win the Nobel Prize.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Resting on Their Laureates? Research Productivity Among Winners of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2023
- Éditeur
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Type
- report
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.